Dr. Priscilla Alfaro, MD, CPC, CPMA, COC, CFE
This auditing and compliance “Tip of the Week” was originally published by the National Alliance for Medical Auditing Specialists (NAMAS), a division of DoctorsManagement.
ICD-10 was officially implemented on October 1, 2015. One of the intents of moving to ICD-10 was to enable and encourage reporting diagnoses with a higher level of specificity. Many payers expect claims to contain specific codes to support the clinical indication for the procedures or services being rendered. ICD-10 has provided so many new codes to increase specificity that reporting unspecified codes could raise either red flags and reviews of your documentation and/or not be reimbursed.
Codes that are “unspecified” or “NOS” (not otherwise specified) are assigned when information in the medical record is missing or the clinical information isn’t sufficient to assign a more specific code. These codes signify that neither the diagnostic statement nor the documentation provides enough information to assign a more specific diagnosis code. For categories without unspecified codes, the “other specified” code may represent both “other” and unspecified. They should be used in limited circumstances.
However, when a procedure code is billed with a NOS ICD-10 code, it may not provide enough information on the claim to support the indication for a procedure. Each encounter’s diagnoses should be coded to the level of certainty known for that encounter.
“Unspecified” codes have acceptable and necessary uses. While specific diagnosis codes should be reported when they are supported by the available medical record documentation and clinical knowledge of the patient’s health condition(s), there are instances when either signs/symptoms or unspecified codes are the best choices for accurately depicting the patient’s diagnoses during the encounter. If a definitive diagnosis has not been established, then the symptoms and signs that are present could be reported. A symptom code may be appropriate when a more definitive diagnosis is not documented, especially in situations where diagnostic tests, such as labs and radiologic studies, are needed to make a definitive diagnosis.
Unspecified codes should be reported when they are the codes that most accurately reflect what is known about the patient’s condition at the time of that particular encounter. The type of encounter, (initial, subsequent, or sequelae, designated by the characters “A,” “D,” and “S” respectively), should also be included when applicable.
Many ICD-10 codes require a fourth, fifth, sixth, or seventh character in order to be valid. Many of these characters can be found in the tabular list. A code is invalid if it does not include the full number of characters required. A three-character code is used only if the category is not further subdivided into four-, five-, six-, or seven-character codes. Always check for applicable seventh characters for that category.
A placeholder character (“X”) is used as part of an alphanumeric code to allow for future expansion and as a placeholder for empty characters in a code that requires a seventh character but has no fourth, fifth, or sixth character.
Whenever the documentation is unclear regarding a borderline condition, coders are encouraged to query the provider for clarification. Borderline conditions are not the same as uncertain diagnoses.
Assign the code that most completely describes the condition that existed at the time of the visit so long as it affect patient care, treatment, and management. Review the tabular instructional notations in the ICD-10-CM book to determine the highest level of specificity for a given code. They will also indicate if additional codes are required.
If laterality applies, include it, whether it is a fifth or sixth digit in an ICD-10 code. If an ICD-10 code is followed by a dash (-) and an additional character icon, then more characters are required. If laterality applies and no bilateral code is provided, then assign separate codes for both the left and right side. It is essential that laterality be coded when it applies to a diagnosis.
For an injury, the specific cause of the injury may be available in the record. The external cause would be reported as a secondary diagnosis with the injury code sequenced first. Most codes in Chapter 20 require a 7th character to identify the type of encounter. Again, the specificity must be consistent and the 7th character assigned to the external cause code should match the 7th character of the code assigned for the associated injury or condition for the encounter.
We should also code to the greatest level of specificity when it comes to CPT procedure codes. An “unlisted” CPT code should only be reported if a specific code for that procedure does not exist. It is also important to apply laterality if it is applicable.
Most payers deny unspecified diagnoses or procedure codes. However, reporting these codes could be justified. It is important to query the provider to capture the highest level of specificity initially and ensure the documentation supports the final codes reported with the appropriate and accurate code assignment.
The ICD-10-CM code set greatly expands the number of codes available in order to capture specificity and granularity. Using unspecified codes should be a last option; be specific.
This Week’s Audit Tip Written By:
Dr. Priscilla Alfaro, MD, CPC, CPMA, COC, CFE
Dr. Priscilla Alfaro is the Chief Medical Officer for Zelis and provides clinical and coding and billing oversight to the Claims Cost Solutions team.
Here’s why thousands of providers trust DoctorsManagement to help improve their coding and documentation.
Quality of coders and auditors. Our US-based auditors receive ongoing training and support from our education division, NAMAS (National Alliance of Medical Auditing Specialists). All team members possess over 15 years of experience and hold both the Certified Professional Coder (CPC®) as well as the Certified Professional Medical Auditor (CPMA®) credential.
Proprietary risk-assessment technology – our auditing team uses ComplianceRiskAnalyzer(CRA)®, a sophisticated analytics solution that assesses critical risk areas. It enables our auditors to precisely select encounters that pose the greatest risk of triggering an audit so that they can be reviewed and the risk can be mitigated.
Synergy – DoctorsManagement is a full-service healthcare consultancy firm. The many departments within our firm work together to help clients rise above the complexities faced by today’s healthcare professionals. As a result, you receive quality solutions from a team of individuals who are current on every aspect of the business of medicine.