Medicare MACs, SMRC, UPIC/ZPIC, and RACs
“Why Can’t You Just Comply?”
by Sean Weiss, Partner & VP of Compliance
Yup, I am going to vent about Medicare Contractors – doesn’t mean I don’t love you; it just means I don’t like when you expect providers and health systems to follow the rules of the Program Integrity Manual (PIM) but you refuse to! Now, there are so many areas I can pick on here – such as the inability to comply with Section 8.4 Statistical Sampling and Extrapolation (which will be my next Blog Post) – but I want to specifically focus on Section 220.127.116.11. My reason for this is because I am constantly inundated with emails and calls from people who have heard me speak at conferences or are clients/customers of DoctorsManagement and/or NAMAS and they’ve received a letter from a Medicare Contractor telling them they have been targeted for review of a random claim sample and they only have 15-days to comply with the demand. If they are a Medicare Contractor, they are in violation of the PIM and the specific section mentioned above. Here is an example:
18.104.22.168 – Time – Frames for Submission (Rev. 628, Issued: 12-04-15, Effective: 11-16-15, Implementation: 01-06-16) This section applies to MACs, RACs, CERT, and ZPICs, as indicated.
- Prepayment Review Time Frames When requesting documentation for prepayment review, the MAC and ZPIC shall notify providers that the requested documentation is to be submitted within 45 calendar days of the request. The reviewer should not grant extensions to providers who need more time to comply with the request. Reviewers shall deny claims for which the requested documentation was not received by day 46.
- Postpayment Review Time Frames When requesting documentation for postpayment review, the MAC, CERT and RAC shall notify providers that the requested documents are to be submitted within 45 calendar days of the request. ZPICS shall notify providers that requested documents are to be submitted within 30 calendar days of the request. Because there are no statutory provisions requiring that postpayment review of the documentation be completed within a certain timeframe, MACs, CERT, and ZPICs have the discretion to grant extensions to providers who need more time to comply with the request. The number of submission extensions and the number of days for each extension is solely within the discretion of the MACs, CERT and ZPICs. RACs shall follow the time requirements outlined in their SOW.
Now, even though the MAC claims in the example above that you have only 14 calendar days to comply, at the bottom of the letter they try to cover their butt by providing the following:
So, the reality is you have 45-days to respond to the ADR and/or request an extension for which they have the authority to grant under CMS Guidelines. Again, don’t confuse 22.214.171.124 (time-frame for submission) with 126.96.36.199 which deals with failure to respond to an ADR:
188.8.131.52 – No Response or Insufficient Response to Additional Documentation Requests (Rev. 721; Issued: 06-09-17; Effective: 07-11-17; Implementation: 07-11-17) This section applies to MACs, RACs, CERT, and ZPICs/UPICs, as indicated.
- Additional Documentation Requests If information is requested from both the billing provider or supplier and a third party and no response is received from either within 45 calendar days for MACs and RACs or 30 calendar days for ZPICs/UPICs after the date of the request (or within a reasonable time following an extension), the MACs, RACs and ZPICs/UPICs shall deny the claim, in full or in part, as not reasonable and necessary. Contractors shall use Group Code: CO – Contractual Obligation and Claim Adjustment Reason Code (CARC) 50 – these are noncovered services because this is not deemed a “medical necessity” by the payer and Remittance Advice Remark Code (RARC) M127 – Missing patient medical record for this service. Contractors shall count these denials as automated review or non-medical record review depending whether the denial is automated or requires manual intervention. For claims that had a PWK modifier, and the unsolicited documentation was reviewed, the review shall be counted as medical record review.
- No Response During prepayment review, if no response is received within 45 calendar days after the date of the ADR, the MACs, and ZPICs/UPICs shall deny the claim. During postpayment review, if no response is received within 45 calendar days after the date of the ADR (or extension), the MACs shall deny the claim as not reasonable and necessary and count these denials as non-medical record reviews. ZPIC/UPICs shall deny the claim as not meeting reasonable and necessary criteria if no response is received within 30 calendar days. RACs shall count these as complex or non-complex reviews.
- Insufficient Response If the MAC, CERT, RAC, or ZPIC/UPIC requests additional documentation to verify compliance with a benefit category requirement, and the submitted documentation lacks evidence that the benefit category requirements were met, the reviewer shall issue a benefit category denial. If the submitted documentation includes defective information (the documentation does not support the physician’s certification), the reviewer shall deny the claim as not meeting the reasonable and necessary criteria.
I realize these sections can get confusing and if you are not reading carefully enough, you can make a very costly mistake such as rushing to send records because you believe you only have 14 calendar days when you actually have 45 days as well as the right to request an extension. So, before you rush to send in your information, check with someone who can ensure your rights under your participation agreement. As they say “Knowing is Knowledge”!
What to do next…
- If you need help with an audit appeal or regulatory compliance concern, contact us at (800) 635-4040 or via email at email@example.com.
- Read more about our: Total Compliance Solution
Why do thousands of providers trust DoctorsManagement to help improve their compliance programs and the health of their business?
Experienced compliance professionals. Our compliance services are structured by a chief compliance officer and supported by a team that includes physicians, attorneys and a team of experienced auditors. The team has many decades of combined experience helping protect the interests of physicians and the organizations they serve.
Quality of coders and auditors. Our US-based auditors receive ongoing training and support from our education division, NAMAS (National Alliance of Medical Auditing Specialists). All team members possess over 15 years of experience and hold both the Certified Professional Coder (CPC®) as well as the Certified Professional Medical Auditor (CPMA®) credentials.
Proprietary risk-assessment technology – our auditing team uses ComplianceRiskAnalyzer(CRA)®, a sophisticated analytics solution that assesses critical risk areas. It enables our auditors to precisely select encounters that pose the greatest risk of triggering an audit so that they can be reviewed and the risk can be mitigated.
Synergy – DoctorsManagement is a full-service healthcare consultancy firm. The many departments within our firm work together to help clients rise above the complexities faced by today’s healthcare professionals. As a result, you receive quality solutions from a team of individuals who are current on every aspect of the business of medicine.