Finding the Positive in the New Normal- Walking Early into 2020
This auditing and compliance “Tip of the Week” was originally published by the National Alliance for Medical Auditing Specialists (NAMAS), a division of DoctorsManagement.
During the rapid pivot to telehealth services during the COVID-19 pandemic, one of the biggest priorities has been staying on top of the array of CMS and private payer rules to ensure these services were payable. These rules included the clear need in most instances for a video connection with the patient, which types of video were appropriate and how to code services based on time.
I’ve been asked by a number of providers to review their telehealth documentation to ensure compliance with the billing rules for telehealth, and the biggest area that has stood out has been concerns with the documented exams that could result in a payer challenging the integrity of the entire service.
As providers adjusted to documenting telehealth, often exams were being brought forward in the template from face-to-face visits that had already been completed. Parts of the exams were perhaps updated, but not the entire exam. The reason I know this is because some documented aspects of the exam were physically impossible to perform over a video connection.
An ear exam done with a tuning fork can’t be performed via telehealth. The patient’s skin cannot be palpated via telehealth. The tenderness of the abdomen cannot be measured via telehealth. A rectal exam of the prostate gland cannot be done via telehealth.
Despite these impossibilities, I’ve seen all of those elements documented in telehealth exams in the past five weeks. In one instance, the pediatrician asked the patient’s parent to palpate the patient’s skin and share her findings, which were recorded in the chart. While this information may have value, it cannot be credited as part of the provider’s exam.
It’s hard enough to survive a payer audit if the auditor is determined to find the deficiencies in your documentation. Don’t make it easy for them. Scrutinize your exams carefully when reviewing telehealth and ask yourself if the exam item you are reviewing could have possibly been performed during a telehealth visit.
Educate your physicians to focus their exams carefully on things that can logically be examined over telehealth and are pertinent to the patient’s problem(s) that day. Rely on documentation of the total service time, when permitted by the payer, for visits that take a long time but lack the required history and exam elements to support the code.
This Week’s Audit Tip Written By:
Scott is a Senior Compliance Consultant with NAMAS parent company, DoctorsManagement
Here’s why thousands of providers trust DoctorsManagement to help improve their coding and documentation.
Quality of coders and auditors. Our US-based auditors receive ongoing training and support from our education division, NAMAS (National Alliance of Medical Auditing Specialists). All team members possess over 15 years of experience and hold both the Certified Professional Coder (CPC®) as well as the Certified Professional Medical Auditor (CPMA®) credential.
Proprietary risk-assessment technology – our auditing team uses ComplianceRiskAnalyzer(CRA)®, a sophisticated analytics solution that assesses critical risk areas. It enables our auditors to precisely select encounters that pose the greatest risk of triggering an audit so that they can be reviewed and the risk can be mitigated.
Synergy – DoctorsManagement is a full-service healthcare consultancy firm. The many departments within our firm work together to help clients rise above the complexities faced by today’s healthcare professionals. As a result, you receive quality solutions from a team of individuals who are current on every aspect of the business of medicine.